(I know, I know.)
Gillette
is getting yelled at on that place where people yell at companies (Twitter).
And it’s pretty much all their fault.
They
chose to promote tweets which criticised their competitor and praised Gillette.
Problem is, it wasn’t just any competitor. It was much-loved, up-and-coming
challenger brand Dollar Shave Club.
(Now where have I heard insightful commentary about
them before?)
Attacking
a small, popular challenger brand without looking mean-spirited and insecure is
a difficult feat. Frankly, it’s virtually impossible. No one reads the story of
David and Goliath and thinks “man, it would have been cool if the big guy had
squished David”. Everyone, up to and including AdWeek, has piled on them in response.
So
not the best move for Gillette, image-wise.
But
I wanted to flag something else about this.
That
one initiative was certainly a bad idea. But the fact that Gillette are
experimenting with unusual marketing ideas in this way is genuinely
commendable. If they hadn’t chosen to use it in a negative way, that concept –
promoting and supporting tweets about their brand – could have been an
extremely powerful, authentic way to get attention.
And
it’s this willingness to play around with formats and try unconventional ideas
that stands them in good stead in the social media age.
For
a more effective example, try their viral campaign in China. By faking a
(barely) risqué “candid” film with Chinese actress Gao Yuanyuan, they created a tension, a
buzz around their category and their product that had huge implications for
their sales.
If
you’re sitting there thinking that maybe that’s just Chinese people being silly
and gullible, you’d be wrong.
(And also kind of racist. Come
on reader. What would your mother think?)
Apart
from anything else, there was a smaller but similar example made with tennis
player Roger Federer not so long ago.
And it took a very long time for it to come out that the stunt was faked. It looks real. It's unexpected. It's cool. Much like the X-Files, we want to believe.
And it took a very long time for it to come out that the stunt was faked. It looks real. It's unexpected. It's cool. Much like the X-Files, we want to believe.
Now,
is hoodwinking the audience the right thing to do? Questionable. But it’s also
pretty harmless in a situation like this.
(I mean, who ever got hurt by
a razor?)
And
beyond all those questions lies this one:
In
this roiling media landscape, how can you hope to survive without trying to innovate?
Innovation
means a willingness to make the odd misstep. It means risking, taking leaps,
trying every option. It means walking in stupid. Creating interesting, playful films like "100 Years of Hair", also featured here a while back.
Does
it always work out? Of course not. But inaction for fear of making a misstep –
that’s a misstep in of itself. Better to reach out and burn your fingers than stay
back and get cold.
And
if you need a good shave – well, you’d better not be afraid of cutting yourself.
If you've enjoyed this article, why not share it on Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn? It helps me grow, and you get to look like an informed, thoughtful and stylish professional. Nice one reader.
If you've enjoyed this article, why not share it on Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn? It helps me grow, and you get to look like an informed, thoughtful and stylish professional. Nice one reader.
No comments:
Post a Comment